Welcome to Xi'an Yongxing Technology Development Co., Ltd., specializing in petroleum logging instruments for 21+years
+8613629207777
WeChat customer service
WeChat customer service
WeChat customer service
WeChat customer service
Your current location:HOME >  Q&A

Testing of Composite Insulators in Operation

Time:2025-04-17  Source:Yongxing  Author:Ruizhi

The main indicators of composite insulator faults during operation are hydrophobicity and hydrophobicity migration, which determine the pollution resistance level of the composite insulator. The key risk points for composite insulator failure during operation include: mechanical strength at the connection between the end fitting and the core rod, the quality of the epoxy resin rod, the quality of the silicone rubber, sealing quality, and proper installation of grading rings.


1. Sample Selection for Composite Insulators Under Test

Based on the characteristics and risk points of composite insulators, the following selection principles are recommended:

  1. Composite insulators installed on towers located downwind within a 5 km radius of industrial pollution sources.

  2. Composite insulators installed on towers within a 3 km radius in heavily polluted multi-source areas.

  3. Composite insulators installed on towers spanning both sides of rivers or lakes.

  4. Composite insulators installed on towers within 1 km radius of wetland areas.

  5. Composite insulators installed on towers within 1 km radius of villages.

  6. Composite insulators on towers with large vertical spans.

  7. Composite insulators on towers located at wind tunnels or windward locations.

  8. Composite insulators on towers in areas with severe icing.

  9. Composite insulators on towers in lightning-prone areas.

  10. Composite insulators on towers in areas with frequent bird activity.

  11. In general, samples should be selected and tested once every two years; if necessary, sampling and testing should be done annually.


2. Water Droplet Condition and Hydrophobicity Analysis Standards (see Table 4–3)

  1. Only separate water droplets are present, and most of the droplets have a receding angle θ₁ ≥ 80°.

  2. Only separate water droplets are present, and most have a receding angle 50° < θ₁ < 80°.

  3. Only separate water droplets are present, droplets are no longer round, most have a receding angle 20° < θ₁ < 50°.

  4. Both separate water droplets and water bands are present, with fully wetted water band areas less than 2 cm², and total wet area less than 90% of the test area.

  5. Some fully wetted water bands are greater than 2 cm², with total wet area less than 90% of the test area.

  6. Fully wetted total area greater than 90%, with a few dry spots or strips remaining.

  7. A continuous water film forms across the entire test area.


3. Hydrophobicity Requirements for Composite Insulator Shed Materials

  1. Hydrophobicity angle should meet: θₐᵥ ≥ 100°, θₘᵢₙ ≥ 90°.

  2. The hydrophobicity class should generally be HC1–HC2, with no more than one HC3 sample.


4. Aging Determination of Composite Insulator Shed Materials

  1. Silicone rubber classified as HC1 or HC2 is considered to have good hydrophobicity.

  2. Silicone rubber classified as HC3 indicates moderate surface aging.

  3. Silicone rubber classified as HC4 to HC5 indicates significant aging.

  4. Silicone rubber classified as HC6 to HC7 indicates complete surface aging.


5. Determination of Temporary Loss of Hydrophobicity

  1. In high humidity conditions, silicone rubber may experience temporary loss of surface hydrophobicity, which can recover over time. The recovery period is influenced by the type of silicone rubber, fillers, material aging, and surface pollution level. Insulators with heavy pollution will recover more slowly.

  2. For newly installed composite insulators, when the HC value is class 1, after 24 hours of water immersion, the average hydrophobicity recovery time is 37.57 seconds (minimum 15s; maximum 85s).

    • Composite insulators with a recovery time > 38s should be closely monitored, as they may indicate unstable hydrophobicity.

  3. The test samples should be sent to a standard laboratory with environmental conditions:

    • The recovery time should not exceed 85 seconds,

    • Any HC level above 3 with a recovery time greater than 85s should be given special attention, and may be determined as unstable hydrophobicity due to aging.

    • Temperature: 20 ± 5°C,

    • Relative humidity: 40%–70%,

    • Immersion in distilled water for 96 hours, with water conductivity < 10 μS/cm at room temperature.

    • Measure hydrophobicity loss and recovery again:


Craftsmanship focused

Craftsmanship focused

Deeply cultivating the petroleum logging instrument industry for 21 years

Self built factory

Self built factory

The factory covers an area of 80 acres and has a building area of 12000 square meters

Our own R&D team

Our own R&D team

The company has over 30 senior technical personnel

Numerous customer cases

Numerous customer cases

Accumulated 1000 domestic and foreign customers+

copyright © 2001-2022 Xi'an Yongxing Technology Development Co., Ltd 陕ICP备2022003979号